Suriin ang IDNStudy.com para sa detalyadong mga sagot sa iyong mga tanong. Ang aming mga eksperto ay nagbibigay ng mabilis at eksaktong sagot upang tulungan kang maunawaan at malutas ang anumang problema.
Sagot :
Answer:
In his speech, Quezon drew a parallel between the Roman and Spanish empires, highlighting the influence of Roman culture and civilization on the Philippines, even centuries after the Roman Empire's decline. He pointed out that Rome, despite conquering vast territories, did not effectively defend the countries under its rule. This, he suggested, was similar to Spain's approach to the Philippines, where they did not grant basic rights like habeas corpus during their three centuries of rule. [1]
Quezon's objective in discussing these two empires was twofold:
1. To illustrate the Philippines' experience under Spanish rule: By comparing Spain's approach to the Philippines with Rome's legacy, Quezon aimed to show how both empires, despite their power, failed to provide lasting security and freedom to their conquered territories. This highlighted the Philippines' vulnerability and the need for self-determination.
2. To emphasize the enduring influence of Roman culture and civilization: Quezon recognized that Roman culture had a profound impact on the Philippines, even in the absence of direct Roman rule. This served to underscore the enduring influence of historical empires on shaping societies and cultures, even long after their political dominance has faded. [1]
In essence, Quezon used the examples of the Roman and Spanish empires to contextualize the Philippines' historical experience, emphasizing the need for self-governance and highlighting the enduring impact of cultural influences.
Pinahahalagahan namin ang bawat ambag mo. Patuloy na magbahagi ng impormasyon at karanasan. Sama-sama tayong magtutulungan upang makamit ang ating mga layunin. Umaasa kami na natagpuan mo ang hinahanap mo sa IDNStudy.com. Bumalik ka para sa mas maraming solusyon!
