Makakuha ng kaugnay na sagot sa lahat ng iyong katanungan sa IDNStudy.com. Ang aming komunidad ay handang magbigay ng malalim at praktikal na mga solusyon sa lahat ng iyong mga katanungan.
Answer:
Primary sources help students relate in a personal way to events of the past and promote a deeper understanding of history as a series of human events. Because primary sources are incomplete snippets of history, each one represents a mystery that students can only explore further by finding new pieces of evidence.
Historical sources are important , it is very necessary to evaluate the sources of history. Not only does it give us more knowledge of our ancestors but also validates the way of life for a civilization or a time period. Evaluating sources of history is like joining the dots to complete a bigger picture.
Answer:
When you analyze a primary source, you are undertaking the most important job of the historian. There is no better way to understand events in the past than by examining the sources — whether journals, newspaper articles, letters, court case records, novels, artworks, music or autobiographies — that people from that period left behind.
Each historian, including you, will approach a source with a different set of experiences and skills, and will therefore interpret the document differently. Remember that there is no one right interpretation. However, if you do not do a careful and thorough job, you might arrive at a wrong interpretation.
In order to analyze a primary source you need information about two things: the document itself, and the era from which it comes. You can base your information about the time period on the readings you do in class and on lectures. On your own you need to think about the document itself. The following questions may be helpful to you as you begin to analyze the sources:
Look at the physical nature of your source. This is particularly important and powerful if you are dealing with an original source (i.e., an actual old letter, rather than a transcribed and published version of the same letter). What can you learn from the form of the source? (Was it written on fancy paper in elegant handwriting, or on scrap-paper, scribbled in pencil?) What does this tell you?
Think about the purpose of the source. What was the author’s message or argument? What was he/she trying to get across? Is the message explicit, or are there implicit messages as well?
How does the author try to get the message across? What methods does he/she use?
What do you know about the author? Race, sex, class, occupation, religion, age, region, political beliefs? Does any of this matter? How?
Who constituted the intended audience? Was this source meant for one person’s eyes, or for the public? How does that affect the source?
What can a careful reading of the text (even if it is an object) tell you? How does the language work? What are the important metaphors or symbols? What can the author’s choice of words tell you? What about the silences — what does the author choose NOT to talk about?
Explanation: