IDNStudy.com, ang iyong platform ng sanggunian para sa pangkomunidad na mga sagot. Tuklasin ang libu-libong mga sagot na na-verify ng mga eksperto at hanapin ang mga solusyong kailangan mo, anuman ang paksa.

Compare or contrast the Items. Give an example to emphasize your point.

1. Hypothesis from conclusion



2. Deductive from inductive reasoning



3. Following scientific method and serendipity





Sagot :

Answer:

1.Hypotheses followed by a conclusion is called an If-then statement or a conditional statement. This is read - if p then q. A conditional statement is false if hypothesis is true and the conclusion is false. The example above would be false if it said "if you get good grades then you will not get into a good college".

2.In logic, we often refer to the two broad methods of reasoning as the deductive and inductive approaches. Deductive reasoning works from the more general to the more specific. ... Inductive reasoning works the other way, moving from specific observations to broader generalizations and theories.

3.Instead, it means that a researcher has made an unexpected discovery due to the specific procedures that they chose to follow in their experiment. Those procedures led to serendipity while another set of procedures may not have done so. A serendipitous discovery in science is often accidental, as its name implies.