IDNStudy.com, ang iyong mapagkukunan para sa mga sagot ng eksperto. Tuklasin ang malalim na sagot sa iyong mga tanong mula sa aming komunidad ng mga bihasang propesyonal.
Sagot :
Answer:
In his speech, Quezon drew a parallel between the Roman and Spanish empires, highlighting the influence of Roman culture and civilization on the Philippines, even centuries after the Roman Empire's decline. He pointed out that Rome, despite conquering vast territories, did not effectively defend the countries under its rule. This, he suggested, was similar to Spain's approach to the Philippines, where they did not grant basic rights like habeas corpus during their three centuries of rule. [1]
Quezon's objective in discussing these two empires was twofold:
1. To illustrate the Philippines' experience under Spanish rule: By comparing Spain's approach to the Philippines with Rome's legacy, Quezon aimed to show how both empires, despite their power, failed to provide lasting security and freedom to their conquered territories. This highlighted the Philippines' vulnerability and the need for self-determination.
2. To emphasize the enduring influence of Roman culture and civilization: Quezon recognized that Roman culture had a profound impact on the Philippines, even in the absence of direct Roman rule. This served to underscore the enduring influence of historical empires on shaping societies and cultures, even long after their political dominance has faded. [1]
In essence, Quezon used the examples of the Roman and Spanish empires to contextualize the Philippines' historical experience, emphasizing the need for self-governance and highlighting the enduring impact of cultural influences.
Ang iyong kontribusyon ay napakahalaga sa amin. Magpatuloy sa pagtatanong at pagbabahagi ng iyong nalalaman. Sama-sama tayong magtatagumpay sa ating layunin. Bawat tanong ay may sagot sa IDNStudy.com. Salamat sa pagpili sa amin at sa muling pagkikita.
